Connect with us

Ocean Literacy

Saving Our Oceans Through Coral Restoration

 

Saving our oceans from the devastating impacts of human choices is possible through coral restoration. Often it can be difficult to know how to aid our oceans in recovery, yet several restoration opportunities exist. While scientists work diligently to help coral reefs recover, societal knowledge and influence is the key to true change.

Loss of Coral Reefs

Humans contribute approximately 40 billion pounds of carbon dioxide to our atmosphere each year through routine activities (Block, 2017). Since the Industrial Revolution, our earth has warmed by 0.7 degrees Celsius due to the amount of carbon dioxide released (Riebeek, 2010). It is estimated that over the next 80 years warming will increase by 2-6 degrees celsius, impacting life on land and life within our oceans (Riebeek, 2010). Approximately 93% of the carbon dioxide put into the atmosphere is absorbed by our oceans, allowing earth’s temperatures to remain stable.  Without a healthy ocean, stability will be compromised, resulting in weather pattern changes and a loss of biodiversity among both plants and animals (Block, 2017).

Coral reefs occupy less than 1% of our oceans, but house more than 25% of our ocean’s fishes (NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program, 2016). They require specific water temperatures in order to survive, exhibiting coral bleaching when ocean temperatures rise above their thresholds. A symbiotic relationship exists between corals and zooxanthellae, a type of algae. This gives corals with their vibrant colors and provides organic material that corals use for growth (US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2013). During coral bleaching the algae is expelled by the coral, causing the coral tissues to become white. Frequently leading to coral death when the stress is extended, corals are unable to recover the algae to the coral’s tissues. 

Restoration Opportunities

Humans need to understand how we alter our earth and how coral restoration efforts can benefit our oceans. Both proactive and reactive measures are possible in support of coral restoration. Proactive avenues include Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and educating the public, which require varying levels of community and government support (Gunderson, 2007; Rinkevich, 2008; Yeemin, Sutthacheep, & Pettongma, 2006). Reactive conservation is working to fix an immediate problem, rather than preemptively working to protect a species or ecosystem. This avenue is more common for restoring ecosystems rather than specific species. There are several techniques utilized for reactive conservation with corals, including silviculture, artificial reefs, and alternative management strategies. While each opportunity has its benefits and drawbacks, there are a variety of approaches to coral restoration.

Marine Protected Areas

MPAs are marine areas being preserved and protected against human harm in regards to animal, shell, and substrate collection. Even so, there are MPAs that allow for collection upon specific circumstances and needs of the ecosystem being conserved. There is the question of whether or not MPAs actually benefit the intended species, area, or ecosystem. While MPAs are a good effort in restoring damaged ecosystems, there isn’t evidence to support MPAs actually benefiting intended organisms (Rinkevich, 2008). Often MPAs are not beneficial because they are inadequately managed, therefore making their purpose moot (Rinkevich, 2008). If the restrictions of MPAs were effectively enforced and respected by humans, their benefit would be greater (International Coral Reef Initiative, 2017; World Wildlife Fund, 2017).  This would ultimately preserve the coral reefs and other species that live within them. Respecting the restrictions of MPAs requires support from local and national governments, as well as from the local people. Human disrespect for the environment is often unintentional, as it is a lack of knowledge about the needs of an ecosystem.

Educating the Public

There is a prevailing disconnect between the scientific community and the general public. This can be seen in areas where locals are seemingly unaware of conservation efforts necessary in their communities. Typically, columnists and officials promote scientific findings through the negative and uninspiring lens of species loss and habitat fragmentation (Gunderson, 2007). This leads the public to a sense of hopelessness and inability to impact conservation efforts (Gunderson, 2007). Once the public is inspired, coral restoration efforts can achieve remarkable success with the aid of public involvement. A great example is a coral reef restoration project in Thailand was executed off of Kham Island (Yeemin et al., 2006). Youth took direct action by  transplanting coral fragments with a success rate of over 90% (Yeemin et al., 2006). Thailand’s coral restoration efforts demonstrated youth’s active voice and important role in how our earth is treated (Yeemin et al., 2006). Ultimately, some researchers argue that local involvement is a key component in effective coral restoration and their reef ecosystems (Yeemin et al., 2006).

Artificial Reefs

Artificial reefs are uncommonly documented and have benefits that spread ecosystem-wide. Creating an artificial reef requires fibreglass pieces to be placed into the ecosystem, creating opportunities for new corals to establish (Ng, Toh, & Chou., 2016). This endeavor is successful, with over 100 species demonstrating a positive increase in population size over 10 years (Ng, Toh, & Chou., 2016). Because fibreglass pieces are plastics, how will they affect the ecosystem post coral establishment. With this consideration and a lack of research on these artificial reefs, hesitation towards this approach is understandable. 

Ng, Toh, & Chou (2016) utilize a method adding plastics to our oceans, allowing for potential toxins to be leached into our environment. With toxins in our oceans, the organisms that live within it are more likely to ingest such toxins. As the individuals ingest toxins throughout their lifespan, a process known as bioaccumulation, the overall health of the individual decreases (Environmental Protection Agency, 2002). When individuals affected by bioaccumulation are consumed by organisms higher on the food chain, the consumers become affected by biomagnification. Biomagnification is where the amount of a toxin within an individual is a higher concentration further up the food chain (Environmental Protection Agency, 2002). As scientists, we should be looking for methods that help restore ecosystems without adding more toxins to the environment. 

Restoring Fish Populations

Another reactive approach, restoring fish populations to increase corals have more potential for success in regards to reef ecosystems.The removal of apex predators from ecosystems creates imbalances which allows the populations of lower level species to overpopulate (Heithaus et al., 2008). To reduce populations of lower level species to healthy numbers, top predator populations need to be restored (Heithaus et al., 2008). Prohibiting overfishing of apex predators is necessary for reef recovery as these species are the least able to recover (Dulvy & Kindsvater, 2015). Prohibiting the use of equipment and fishing practices can be ineffective (Rinkevich, 2008). These measures are taxing and not well managed by the associated governments (Rinkevich, 2008). Dulvy & Kindsvater (2015) work to restore corals and reef ecosystems with the use of fish population restoration. However, it has not been shown to be as effective as creating an artificial reef (Dulvy & Kindsvater, 2015). Further research is needed to determine if restored populations will continue living in an environment being restored. A concern is that restored populations with either die-off quickly or relocate to a location with acceptable resources already intact.

Silviculture

Through silviculture, small pieces of coral are clipped and farmed (in situ, ex situ, or both) (Epstein, Bak, & Rinkevich, 2001; Epstein, Bak, & Rinkevich, 2003; Shafir, Rijn, & Rinkevich, 2006). After, they are returned to the damaged reef to live, continue reproducing, and provide resources to other species (Epstein, Bak, & Rinkevich, 2001; Epstein, Bak, & Rinkevich, 2003; Shafir, Rijn, & Rinkevich, 2006). One consideration is whether to focus on sexually or asexually reproducing species. Rinkevich (2000) tested fragments of two Acropora subspecies and found that asexually reproducing Acropora digitifera performed better than sexually reproducing Acropora hyacinthus. Similarly, asexually reproducing Acropora spp. performed greater than sexually reproducing Acropora spp (Boch & Morse, 2012). Important factors to consider beyond coral itself are water speed and quality, which affect coral material. One approach is treating reefs similarly to forests, where dead areas are evaluated and restored based on ecosystem needs (Epstein et al., 2003). This requires ecosystem evaluation prior to transplantation.  

Technique adaptability (the ability for a technique to be used across genuses) is important in restoring corals through silviculture. Stylophora pistillata and Acropora spp. are utilized in multiple studies each, with Pocillopora damicornis appearing once (Boch & Morse, 2012; Epstein et al., 2001; Rinkevich, 2000; Shafir et al., 2006). Acropora spp. is most commonly utilized in coral restoration and appears to have the highest success rates. A lack of success among S. pistillata and P. damicornis, demonstrates the need for easily modifiable techniques across genuses (Boch & Morse, 2012; Epstein et al., 2001; Rinkevich, 2000; Shafir et al., 2006). To restore entire coral ecosystems, research of restoration efforts of other coral species beyond Acropora spp. are vital.

Looking Forward

Proactive coral restoration poses greater promise for future environmental health compared to more common reactive efforts. Each restoration technique requires an understanding of the effort required to benefit the health, growth, and success of our corals. Coral restoration efforts allow for healthier reef ecosystems and oceans, and scientists need our help to advocate for our ocean. After inspiring ocean advocates, we can build on the knowledge of local environments, then expand upon it to the entire ocean. After creating reef advocates, we should promote reef-friendly changes in human habits and focus on restoring reefs as an ecosystem. These ecosystem-focused restoration techniques should involve restoration of several species within our reefs, including fish that live within them.

Stacy Craft, B.S.

M.A. Student, Project Dragonfly – Miami University, Oxford, OH

Instructional Aide, T.E.R.I., Inc., San Marcos, CA

Educator, Sea Life Aquarium, Carlsbad, CA

Instructor, Helen Woodward Animal Center, Rancho Santa Fe, CA

Correspondence can be sent to Stacy Craft B.S. by email at craftsl@miamioh.edu or by phone to (909) 342-3995.

Acknowledgement: Stacy Craft B.S. completed this project as a part of her graduate work with Project Dragonfly at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio in conjunction with San Diego Zoo Global. She would like to thank Project Dragonfly students and staff that helped with editing her work, with special thanks to Emily Craft for support throughout this process.

Resources

  • Block, B. (2017, September). Oceans absorb less carbon dioxide as marine systems change. 
  • Retrieved September 27, 2017, from http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6323 Boch, C. A., & Morse, A. N. C. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of direct propagation techniques for coral restoration of Acropora spp. Ecological Engineering, 40, 11-17.
  • Dulvy, N. K., & Kindsvater, H. K. (2015). Recovering the potential for coral reefs. Nature, 520304-305.
  • Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Bioaccumulation / biomagnification effects. RetrievedOctober 23, 2017, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/bioaccumulationbiomagnificationeffects.pdf 
  • Epstein, N., Bak, R. P. M., & Rinkevish, B. (2001). Strategies for gardening denuded coral reef areas: The applicability of using different types of coral material for reef restoration. Restoration Ecology, 9, 432-442.
  • Epstein, N., Bak, R. P. M., & Rinkevish, B. (2003). Applying forest restoration principles to coral reef rehabilitation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13387-395.
  • Gunderson, L. (2007). Ecology: A different route to recovery for coral reefs. Current Biology, 17R28.
  • Heithaus, M. R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A. J., & Worm, B. (2008). Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. ScienceDirect, 23, 202-210.
  • International Coral Reef Initiative. (2017). Status of and threat to coral reefs. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from http://www.icriforum.org/about-coral-reefs/status-and-threat-coral-reefs
  • Ng, C. S. L., Toh, T. C., & Chou, L. M. (2016). Coral restoration in Singapore’s sediment-challenged sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 8, 422-429.
  • NOAA’s Coral Reef Conservation Program. (2016, September 10). Existing and potential value of coral ecosystems with respect to income and other economic values. Retrieved October 01, 2017, from https://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcorals/values/biodiversity/ 
  • Riebeek, H. (2010). Global warming. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page5.php
  • Rinkevich, B. (2000). Steps towards the evaluation of coral reef restoration by using small branch fragments. Maine Biology, 136, 807-812.
  • Rinkevich, B. (2008). Management of coral reefs: We have gone wrong when neglecting active reef restoration. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56, 1821-1824.
  • Shafi, S., Rijn, J. V., & Rinkevich, B. (2006). Steps in the construction of underwater coral nursery an essential component in reef restoration acts. Marine Biology, 149, 679-687.
  • US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2013, June 01). Corals. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_corals/coral02_zooxanthellae.html
  • World Wildlife Fund. (2017). Coral reefs: Threats. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/blue_planet/coasts/coral_reefs/coral_threats/
  • Yeemin, T., Sutthacheep, M., & Pettongma, R. (2006). Coral reef restoration projects in Thailand. Ocean & Coastal Management, 49, 562-575.

[xyz-ihs snippet=”Prepared-by-PK”]

Continue Reading

Issue 121 - June 2025

What Can Whales Tell Us About Human Queer Identities?

A lot of the time, we humans like to consider ourselves unique, evolved, and somewhat separate from our animal cousins. We, however, have a lot more in common than we think. While our culture has historically had a negative attitude towards homosexuality, for over 1,500 species of animal, homosexual behavior is natural. Cetaceans (i.e., whales, dolphins, and porpoises) in particular have been recorded expressing an entire spectrum of queer behaviors. This group of species are considered more emotionally intelligent than humans, suggesting that their thoughts and emotions are more complex and developed than our own. Which leads to the question – what can whales tell us about human queer identities?

The Anti-Nuclear Family

While the Spice Girls may have coined the term Girl Power in the late 1990s, whales have been living this slogan since time immemorial. A society led by ‘single’ females is one that may be unconventional to us yet is traditional beneath the waves. Matrilineal social structures, where females are head of the family and a male’s main contribution is reproduction, is standard across many species of cetacean. Back when Northern Resident killer whale C1 (Namu) was accidentally captured in nets in British Columbia in the 1960s, and subsequently transported to Seattle aquarium in a floating sea pen, the media considered the whales following Namu to be his wife and children. In fact, these whales were his mom and siblings. Some of the first people to study killer whales also thought that pods were led by the largest male in the group (i.e., patriarchal), when in fact these males are in fact largely dependent on their moms for their whole lives. Whale families are more akin to human family structures led by single moms, lesbian moms, or moms raising their kids with a village of family and friends. There is something to be said about the world’s most emotionally evolved species being led by females.

A matrilineal group of killer whales, including a calf, swimming closely together in coastal waters.
Members of the T049A matriline. Left to right: T049A (matriarch), T049A4 (fourth offspring of T049A), and T049A3 (third offspring of T049A). Credit: Chloe Robinson.

‘Bromances’ and ‘Gal Pals’

As a lesbian, I have been victim of the ‘friends’ or ‘sisters’ generalization when my wife and I are doing something as basic as renewing our health cards or going out for dinner. This human bias also translates to the underwater world of whales. Killer whales typically stay with their moms their whole lives, but sometimes, male whales are seen outside of their immediate family group. There are instances of two or more male, adult killer whales travelling and associating with each other for years, like shark-eating Port with Starboard off South Africa, T128 (Flotsam) with T125A (Jetsam) in the Northeast Pacific, and W001 (John Coe) with W008 (Aquarius) off the west coast of Scotland. Whether these whales are together through circumstance (i.e., roommates) or more (i.e., lovers), these associations are typically labelled ‘brothers’ or ‘friends’. Similarly, female sperm whales are considered to form life-long friendships with other females. They are even known to share the equivalent of ‘inside jokes’ through unique dialects across generations, redefining our human standards of BFFs. As this species is deep diving, we as humans only get to observe this species for the brief moments they are at the surface, meaning there could be a lot more going on between these besties than meets the eye.

A lone male killer whale with a tall dorsal fin gliding through calm gray waters.
T125A (Jetsam) who is seen travelling with suspected brother/friend/maybe lover T128 (Flotsam). Credit: Ocean Wise MML-18.

From assumptions to observations, whilst captivity limits the ability of whales to exhibit natural behaviors, it’s one benefit is the ability to observe whales up close and personal – for science. Lesbian sex between killer whales has been observed in captivity, and whilst the reason behind this behavior is not 100% confirmed, some scientists have suggested that same-sex genital contact in female dolphins is driven by their ability to feel pleasure via their evolved clitorises. Females however are not alone in this. Homosexual behaviors are more commonly observed between male whales (maybe because it is more obvious…). In western Australia, male bottlenose dolphins regularly take part in sexual contact with other males to strengthen long-term alliances and maintain social structure. Bottlenose dolphins off western UK waters have also been reported to exhibit similar behavior. Dolphins, however, are not alone in this. Humpback whales were in the news recently for exhibiting the same behavior off the coast of Hawaii. The first time that sex between two humpback whales was photographed and it happened to be between two male whales. Similarly, male killer whale ‘bachelor’ groups have been observed rubbing body parts together, including their “sea snakes”. Whilst we can only attribute physical sexual observations to whales due to the limitations of field research and our understanding, it is possible that whales exhibit more than sexually-driven attraction for the same-sex. Female humpback whales have previously been recorded singing (usually a trait exclusive to male whales) during the breeding season. Whether this is because the whale wanted to deter nearby male whales, attract a female, or because the whale identified as a male – we will never know.

Two dolphins swimming just below the surface of crystal-clear waters near a rocky coastline.
Bottlenose dolphins engaging in sexual contact in Cardigan Bay (UK). Credit: Katrin Lohrengel/Sea Watch Foundation.

It’s in Their DNA

An important part of the 2SLGBTQIA+ rainbow includes the ‘I’ – intersex individuals. As well as being born with sex characteristics that are not “typical” for male or female bodies, they are also more likely to identify as queer than non-intersex people. For humans, there is a general lack of research for intersex-identifying individuals, so it is no surprise that there is similarly an incomplete understanding in the world of whales. One of the earliest observations in cetaceans was of an intersex fin whale back in the 1960s, and in recent years, there have been numerous additional observations of wild intersex whales including common dolphins, beaked whales, beluga whales, and southern right whales. The era of DNA-based assessment of whales has driven the discovery of intersex individuals, showing that in cetaceans, intersex is more common than historically thought. Suites of DNA tests, when used in parallel, essentially show that XXY or XYY are possible variations of sex chromosomes instead of being considered ‘anomalies’ through a heteronormative lens. In my own research, we use these exact tools to try and figure out the sex of wild whales from the DNA they leave behind in their ‘wake’ – i.e., flukeprints. While this approach can tell us if the DNA signature is male or female (sometimes with ambiguous results), I am often left wondering how the animals perceive and identify themselves. Lastly, in the whale research world, if we do not know the sex of a whale we are monitoring, most refer to them as they/them – the singular pronoun. Gender-neutral pronouns exist in the animal world as they do in the human world and using them is really not that difficult.

A common dolphin mid-leap out of the ocean, with visible water spray and sunlight on its sleek body.
Common dolphins are one example of a cetacean species with reported intersex individuals. Credit: Chloe Robinson/Sea Watch Foundation.

So, there it is. A light-hearted look at the queer lives of whales and how it makes us think more about what it means to be in the 2SLGBTQIA+ community. I of course caveat with the above as daring to look through a non-heteronormative lens (at the risk of anthropomorphizing), to get you thinking about how our queer identities are not all that different from our animal cousins. In fact, it is natural and should be celebrated as part of the diversity of life.

 


About the Author

Dr. Chloe Robinson smiling indoors, wearing an Ocean Wise sweatshirt with a vibrant backdrop.

Dr. Chloe Robinson (she/they) is a scientist, conservationist, and science communicator. She currently holds the position of Advisor & Technical Lead for the Whales Initiative at Ocean Wise, where she leads conservation programs aimed at protecting vulnerable whale species. As a scientist, they primarily focus on developing and implementing environmental DNA-based approaches for closing data gaps on whales and their prey, having published 25+ peer-reviewed articles on the application of non-invasive methods for monitoring biodiversity. As a conservationist, she leads the Whale Report Alert System (WRAS), which reduces the risk of ship strike for large whale species across the west coast of North America. As a science communicator, she has won awards for their contributions to public engagement and science dissemination. She identifies as a gender non-conforming lesbian and a passionate advocate for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) in science. They have spearheaded initiatives such as a workshop series at the University of Guelph to increase 2SLGBTQIA+ visibility in STEM, a Pride seminar series at Swansea University, and the annual Big Gay Whale Watch on Vancouver Island. Chloe considers themself lucky to be an uninvited settler living, working, and playing on traditional territories of the lək̓ʷəŋən (Lekwungen) peoples (“Victoria’, Canada), where she lives with their wife, son, cats, and many whale neighbours.

Continue Reading

News

New Coral Gardens and Hydrothermal Vents Found in the Icy Depths of the Remote South Sandwich Islands

Hydrothermal Vents Found in the Icy Depths of the Remote South Sandwich Islands 

An Ocean Census Flagship expedition and GoSouth team of scientists found suspected new species, discovered one of the island chain’s shallowest hydrothermal vents, and explored the deepest trench in the Southern Ocean. 

Palo Alto, CA, USA — An international team of scientists on a recent 35-day deep-sea expedition to one of the most remote island chains in the world observed thriving polar ecosystems, discovered new hydrothermal vents, coral gardens, and many suspected new species. The Ocean Census Flagship expedition aboard Schmidt Ocean Institute’s research vessel Falkor (too) explored the South Sandwich Islands, including one of the coldest and most isolated submarine trenches on the planet, and also found evidence of explosive volcanism. This was the same expedition that filmed the first confirmed sighting of a juvenile colossal squid.

A vibrant collection of pink and orange deep-sea corals and anemones growing in the dark, thriving near hydrothermal activity.
A vibrant grouping of coral, documented on on Humpback Seamount. During the expedition, researchers discovered coral gardens, hydrothermal vents, and many new species, including corals, sponges, snails, urchins, and sea stars.

The expedition was part of the Nippon Foundation–Nekton Ocean Census program, the world’s largest initiative to accelerate the discovery of ocean life. The Ocean Census scientists led the species discovery efforts, uncovering a wide range of potentially new marine life — including corals, sponges, snails, sea urchins, benthic ctenophores, and sea stars. The exact number of new species will be announced later this year following an Ocean Census workshop, where taxonomic experts will formally assess and catalog the findings. The GoSouth team — a collaboration between the University of Plymouth (UK), GEOMAR (Germany), and the British Antarctic Survey (UK) — investigated the effects of geohazards, including tsunamis, volcanoes, and earthquakes.

A scientist in a bright orange parka carefully measures a core sample from the seafloor using a ruler, aboard the research vessel.
During the last dive of the expedition the science team gather biological and geological samples from ROV SuBastian. Here, the GoSouth team process push cores. Pictured: Tea Isler (scientist, Alfred Wegener Institute)

“This expedition has given us a glimpse into one of the most remote and biologically rich parts of our ocean. This is exactly why the Ocean Census exists — to accelerate our understanding of ocean life before it’s too late,” said Dr. Michelle Taylor, head of science and expedition principal investigator at the Ocean Census, and senior lecturer at the University of Essex. “The 35 days at sea were an exciting rollercoaster of scientific discovery; the implications of which will be felt for many years to come as discoveries filter into management action.”

A bright white orange nudibranch
A nudibranch observed at 268 metres on the eastern side of Montagu Island, where temperatures hovered at +0.35°C. Nudibranchs are soft-bodied marine gastropods known for their vivid colours and intricate forms.

Mother Nature threw everything she had at the expedition, said Taylor, including a subsea earthquake, tropical storm force winds with hurricane-level gusts, eight-meter (26-foot) waves, and icebergs to navigate.

A blue and white research vessel cruises through icy Antarctic waters with a snow-covered volcanic island and drifting iceberg in the background.
Research Vessel Falkor (too) conducts studies off the South Sandwich Islands, including a site close to Montagu Island. The South Sandwich Islands area is extremely active volcanically.

Located in the South Atlantic, the South Sandwich Islands are part of a rich mosaic of geologic features such as hadal zone trenches, underwater volcanoes, and spreading centers — features created by tectonic forces that have supported the evolution of species found nowhere else on the planet. It took eight days for the research vessel to travel to the islands from the port of Punta Arenas, Chile.

A female scientist in an Ocean Census lab coat smiles while photographing a marine specimen displayed on a large screen in a shipboard laboratory.
Jialing Cai (Ocean Census photographer) in the Hydro Lab where the team photograph specimens.

The GoSouth team, led by Co-Chief Scientist Dr. Jenny Gales, discovered two pockmarks in the mapping data of an underwater caldera — a bowl-shaped depression in the seafloor, left after a volcano erupts. Pockmarks can indicate hydrothermal activity. Using a “nested” approach, the team deployed Schmidt Ocean Institute’s remotely operated vehicle, SuBastian to map the pockmarks at a higher resolution and confirm the presence of vents.

A hydrothermal vent chimney on the seafloor covered with marine life including bacteria and snails, surrounded by dark volcanic rock and swimming fish.
Researchers discovered hydrothermal vents at 700 meters depth (nearly 2300 feet) on the northeast side of Quest Caldera, off the South Sandwich Islands. The tallest vent chimney was four meters (13 feet), and they were was covered with an array of life, including sea snails and barnacles.

The larger pockmark contained three hydrothermal vents, and the smaller contained one. Located at 700 meters depth (nearly 2300 feet), they are one of the shallowest hydrothermal vents to have been discovered near the South Sandwich Islands, and the only ones to be explored using a remotely operated vehicle. The tallest vent chimney was four meters (13 feet), making it about as tall as a basketball hoop. Each vent was covered with an array of life dependent on chemosynthesis, including sea snails and barnacles. Thriving coral gardens and large sponges were found in close proximity to the vents — an unusual observation, said Taylor.

A close-up of a dragonfish (Akarotaxis aff. gouldae) resting on a rock on the deep-sea floor, showing its elongated body and pointed snout.
This is the first-ever footage of Akarotaxis aff. gouldae, a species of dragonfish discovered just two years ago. Its documentation during this expedition off the South Sandwich Islands provides valuable insight into the deep-sea biodiversity of this remote region.

“Discovering these hydrothermal vents was a magical moment, as they have never been seen here before,” said Gales, an associate professor in Ocean Exploration at the University of Plymouth (UK). “It’s an incredible discovery that provides valuable insights into the area’s tectonic activity. Making such a discovery is rare. It highlights the importance of ocean exploration and seafloor mapping.”

While exploring underwater mountains and the South Sandwich Trench — one of the coldest and most isolated submarine trenches on the planet — researchers found these snailfish eggs had been laid on a black coral, a previously unknown behavior.
While exploring underwater mountains and the South Sandwich Trench — one of the coldest and most isolated submarine trenches on the planet — researchers found these snailfish eggs had been laid on a black coral, a previously unknown behavior.

In addition to the vents, other notable observations during the expedition included:

  • In the trench, scientists found snailfish eggs that had been laid on a black coral, as well as a potential new sea cucumber species;
  • large pumice blocks, indicating that the South Sandwich Islands are capable of explosive volcanism; 
  • a vibrant coral garden located west of Saunders Island at a depth of 120 meters (394 feet); 
  • Capturing the first footage of Akarotaxis aff. gouldae, a species of dragonfish that was discovered two years ago.

“The challenging ocean and weather conditions and the isolated location of the South Sandwich Islands capture the imagination of the boldest explorers — often the closest humans to the vessel were on the International Space Station,” said Schmidt Ocean Institute’s Executive Director, Dr. Jyotika Virmani. “We are proud to have collaborated with Ocean Census in their mission to advance the discovery of marine life and GoSouth in their quest to better understand the geological nature of this dynamic corner of the world.” 

Two scientists aboard the Falkor (too) observe coral footage on screens in the vessel’s control room during a deep-sea dive.
In the control room of Research Vessel Falkor (too), Chief Scientist Michelle Taylor (University of Essex) and Scientist Tea Isler (Alfred Wegener Institute) marvel at a massive coral — potentially over a thousand years old — spotted during a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) dive on the northeast side of Quest Caldera, off the South Sandwich Islands.

Image Credit: Jialing Cai / The Nippon Foundation – Nekton Ocean Census / Schmidt Ocean Institute


About the Organizations:

Schmidt Ocean Institute was established in 2009 by Eric and Wendy Schmidt to catalyze the discoveries needed to understand our ocean, sustain life, and ensure the health of our planet through the pursuit of impactful scientific research and intelligent observation, technological advancement, open sharing of information, and public engagement, all at the highest levels of international excellence. For more information, visit www.schmidtocean.org.

The Nippon Foundation–Nekton Ocean Census is the world’s largest mission to accelerate the discovery of ocean life. Launched in April 2023 by The Nippon Foundation and Nekton, it unites philanthropy, government, science, business, media, and civil society to revolutionise how marine species are found and studied. With only 240,000 marine species documented and millions more yet to be discovered, Ocean Census is working to close critical biodiversity knowledge gaps. Learn more at www.oceancensus.org.

The University of Plymouth is renowned worldwide for its high-quality research, teaching and innovation. With a mission to Advance Knowledge and Transform Lives, the University drives the global debate in disciplines from marine and maritime science to medicine, law, computing and climate action. A three-time winner of the Queen’s Anniversary Prize for Higher and Further Education – most recently in respect of its pioneering research on microplastics pollution in the ocean – Plymouth consistently ranks among the world’s leading universities for its innovation, research and teaching in relation to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Its growing global presence is reinforced by the 200,000 alumni it has pursuing their chosen careers right across the world. http://www.plymouth.ac.uk.

The GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel is one of the world’s leading marine research institutions. Its research covers a wide range of physical, chemical, biological and geological ocean processes, from the seabed to the atmosphere. The centre is a member of the Helmholtz Association, Germany’s largest research organisation. As part of the GoSouth team, GEOMAR was involved in researching geological processes such as underwater volcanism and hydrothermal vents during the expedition. GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel

The British Antarctic Survey strives to uncover the secrets of the Polar Regions and the frozen regions of the Earth. Our expertise spans the depths of the oceans to the inner edge of space. Our research highlights the fragility of the Earth’s frozen environments, and what that means for our planet. We have been living and working in the extremes of Antarctica and the Arctic for over 60 years. Our scientists discovered the hole in the ozone layer and identified key evidence for climate change in ancient ice – our science continues to inform decision-makers. We provide the UK’s national polar capability by operating research stations, aircraft and Royal Research Ship Sir David Attenborough, supporting science at the poles and securing the UK’s presence in Antarctic affairs. Find us at:  https://www.bas.ac.uk  The British Antarctic Survey is part of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). NERC is part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI).

At the University of Essex we’re ranked 58th out of 2,152 universities assessed worldwide in the global Times Higher Education Impact Rankings 2024. University of Essex research is committed to making a difference and our scientists are at the forefront of promoting sustainable approaches from the marine sciences through to Agri-tech. The University has partnerships with leading organisations including Ocean Census, CEFAS, and the Gates Foundation – to make the world a better place. At the University of Essex, we’re big believers in the power of change to create hope for a brighter future. It’s what inspired us at the start, drives us today, and shapes our future.

Continue Reading

Aquacultures & Fisheries

Breathe. Wheel. Flukes Up. Dive. Swim On, Whales!

April 24th was Massachusetts Right Whale Day. A vertical puff of water vapor split the air on that bright, calm day in Cape Cod Bay off Provincetown’s Wood End Lighthouse. The V-shaped blow is not visible because the whale is positioned broadside to us. Most baleen whales have narrower spouts. With no dorsal fin and a brief glimpse of broad flukes—the whale’s tail—confirms the presence of a right whale, approximately 50 feet long.

Right whale spout seen from afar with Wood End Lighthouse in the background on a clear blue day.

A right whale releases a vertical spout off Provincetown’s Wood End Lighthouse on Massachusetts Right Whale Day.

Right whales are so rare that whale-watching vessels must stay at least 500 yards, or 1,500 feet, away so as not to disturb them. Right whales are like icebergs in freshwater, with most of their bodies hidden underwater. We watched the magnificent mammals from a distance.

Two right whales worked the shore along Herring Cove. Herring gulls showed no interest in the whales as they followed the fishing boat, heading for the harbor with the morning’s catch. Right whales eat zooplankton, straining small animals that drift in the water column with six-foot-long cartilage plates hanging down from the roof of the whale’s mouth. Hairs on baleen form a fine mesh that traps zooplankton inside, where the whale’s tongue, the size of a BMW Smart car, swipes and swallows.

A pair of right whales swim in synchronization, turning and rolling onto their right side to elevate the left side of their flukes above the water. A third whale follows closely behind the twisting whales.

Today, the whales are likely eating shoals of Calanus copepods that are corralled between them and the steeply rising shore. We saw between 12 and 17 right whales from Race Point, with its lighthouse, to Long Point, which has a lighthouse at the tip of the sandy finger at the end of the raised arm known as Cape Cod.

Further offshore from Herring Cove, a slim, long whale with a sharply curved dorsal fin blows, wheels, and dives. With many decades of experience, the whale-watch boat captain maneuvers closer and stops the engine as a second sei whale surfaces. Reaching as much as 60 feet, sei whales are the third largest whale in the world, preceded by blue and fin whales. Sei is Norwegian for pollack fish, as they were often seen together. 

Sei whale dorsal fin just above surface in calm blue waters off the Cape.

A sei whale arches before diving — its slim frame and distinct dorsal fin barely breaking the surface.

The two dark, bluish-gray whales settle beneath the water beside the boat, the white of their undersides visible as they roll onto their sides. The roqual grooves along their pleated chin and cheeks distend. Still in the water, these whales let the plankton float into their mouths, or so we think, as we cannot see any plankton in the dark waters. They rose to breathe after a few minutes, which seemed to our astonishment like an eternity.

The first humpback whales of the season are found north of Race Point. Low in the water, they appear to be lounging about, perhaps taking it easy after a morning of feeding on sand lance. Last week, I found the pencil-thin fish on the Herring Cove beach, likely dropped by a gull. 

A humpback whale partially surfaced, showing blowholes and dorsal fins in blue open ocean.

A humpback whale lies below the surface with its blowholes and dorsal fin above the water.

A humpback whale lies below the surface with its blowholes and dorsal fin above the water. To the right, a second whale stirs the water that laps over its back. 

The boat floats by the two humpback whales. Looking through the water, we see the whale’s 15-foot-long white flipper.  The scientific name for humpback whales is Megaptera novaeangliae, meaning large-winged New Englander.

We are startled to see a second flipper looming white beneath the whale. A third whale is stealthily poised directly below the whale on the surface.  When we saw two whales on the surface, there were really four humpbacks, surfacing two by two.

Later, all four whales were on the surface nearly at once. One rolled on its side to reach an enormous flipper to the sky. The narrator assured us that the whale was not waving. Whales slap the water to communicate with more distant whales, but there were no slapping sounds today.     

The whales slowly drifted beneath our vessel, revealing their entire outlines from above. Here, the tail fluke can be seen while the head and flippers are on the other side of the boat. The whales moved beneath us, from left to right and then from right to left, four times!

Finally, a humpback whale lifted its tail before diving. The black and white pattern on the underside was recognized as belonging to the female humpback named Habanero for the appearance of a chili pepper mark. Habanero is well known to the Dolphin Fleet of whale watch vessels. Habanero was observed with a calf in September 2012.  A second humpback was identified as Candlestick. The other two humpbacks never showed their tails.

Tail fluke of a humpback whale above the water, with Cape Cod shoreline and water tower in background.

The black-and-white tail fluke of Habanero, a known female humpback, rises above the bay before she dives deep once more.

Returning to the harbor, the right whales continued to forage along the shoreline. These whales are called urban whales because they come near our urban shores more often than others. Right whales do not migrate, except for females that give birth off Savannah and Jacksonville. The newborns have little blubber and require warm water. However, these clear waters offer little food. Therefore, right whales travel to Cape Cod Bay for the abundant shoals of zooplankton. They may stay for six weeks before spreading out across the North Atlantic.

Lobstermen do not trap during April and May along Massachusetts’ sandy shores and boat traffic consists of smaller vessels alert to right whales. The greatest threat to right whale survival is the diminishing availability of food. Our pollutants have caused phytoplankton productivity to drop by 60% since 2000. Copepods now have less fat content, requiring whales to consume more to obtain the same nutritional value.  

What we are doing to the land is harmful. We have crossed a tipping point by removing vegetation and soil, which hard surfaces and urbanization have replaced. There are cascading negative consequences. Boston’s annual rainfall is a steady 46.4 inches a year, yet, destructive stormwater and combined sewer overflows are rising because we have removed the vegetation and the soil carbon sponge.

Water that once soaked into the ground now washes across heat islands. It warms up and transports heat to the ocean. The year 2023 was not an exceptionally hot summer for Boston but it was the wettest summer since 1955. This resulted in a record warming of the Gulf of Maine surface waters nearest to Boston. While 2021 was Boston’s hottest summer, the surface ocean water did not experience significant warming.

Nutrients spilled into the sea fuel harmful algal blooms and ocean dead zones.  The ten-fold increase in the use of the herbicide Roundup since 1996, when Monsanto developed crops resistant to glyphosate, is likely more than coincidental to the loss of phytoplankton.

The solution to the threat to the ocean ecosystems on which whales depend lies on land. Land should be granted the right to retain the rainwater that falls upon it. Developers should not be permitted to profit from their constructions while leaving the municipality responsible for managing increased stormwater, likely leaving people in the flood zone standing in CSO sewage. 

The dry land heats up worsening climate change when developers starve the land of water.  Property owners must instead slow water down, return it to the ground where plants may draw to photosynthesize during the dry season, where groundwater may recharge rivers, and with water in the ground to prevent forest fires. Let’s improve the whale’s marine ecosystem with no more pollution, stormwater damage, and ocean heating from the land.

Returning past Race Point, a right whale raised its head high out of the water. Gray baleen plates hung beneath a white, encrusted black upper lip. In doing so, I don’t know what advantage was gained by the whale. I took it as a smile, as my smile was no less broad.

Nearly fifty years ago, on April 15, 1976, I was on the first Dolphin Fleet whale watch. We saw right whales and a humpback whale that the boat captain’s son would later name Salt when he became the boat captain. Since then, Salt has birthed 12 calves and is the grandmother of seven more humpback whales. There were then estimated to be 350 right whales. Today’s estimate is 372 whales, not including the ten calves born last winter.

I was on the first commercial whale watch because two summers earlier, I was alone on the deck of a 27-foot sailboat, south of Seguin Light off the coast of Maine. A right whale surfaced next to the boat. I babbled, having never imagined that something alive could be the size of a sandbar. The whale left only a circular slick spot on the water for the rest of the crew to see.

We are fortunate to be in the company of whales, which grace our sandy shores for about six weeks in spring. The loss of vegetation and soil on our properties and in neighborhoods is harming the marine ecosystem on which right whales depend to break their winter fast. To ensure future generations can share the ocean with a burgeoning right whale population, we must increase the carbon sponge on our land and stop stormwater runoff.  

Breathe. Wheel. Flukes up. Dive. Swim on, whales! 


Rob Moir in Greenland

Dr. Rob Moir is a nationally recognized and award-winning environmentalist. He is the president and executive director of the Ocean River Institute, a nonprofit based in Cambridge, MA, that provides expertise, services, resources, and information not readily available on a localized level to support the efforts of environmental organizations. Please visit www.oceanriver.org for more information.


Ocean River Logo

More from Dr. Rob Moir

Continue Reading

Trending